I often wonder what young people think of Georgia O'Keeffe's art. Now more than a century since her breakout solo exhibition in 1923, how are her paintings seen? What fresh contexts are they given? Interpretations?
What new life, if any, will Gen Z offer O'Keeffe? Arielle C. Frommer, for one, has transformed the artist into a Harvard undergrad.
Georgia O’Keeffe: Look for yourself
That Kate Alfriend must have been one heck of a charmer. In 1938, Georgia O’Keeffe made no speech when she accepted her honorary Doctorate of Fine Arts at the College of William & Mary, but she did choose to give a few words to the girl reporter for the student newspaper.
This may be the most direct, explicit, extended statement by O’Keeffe about her art that I have read in the O’Keeffe literature. But can you unring a bell once it’s been rung? Will viewers ever get beyond the so-called “vaginas” that they’ve been told to see?
Want more? Click here to subscribe to this blog
That’s what O’Keeffe wanted. For us to really look — at her paintings, and at the world around us.
Don’t ever believe anything you read about a work of art except what you see in it yourself.
I suppose the reason that art critics write long and flowery criticism about works of art is to make a living. My paintings, but especially my flower compositions do not have any deep meaning or any great emotional significance behind them. Nevertheless, people like my paintings because they are novel and different, often read into them their own feelings and experiences, which do not belong to the paintings.
When I first began to exhibit my paintings I realized that people seldom notice a small flower composition. Therefore, I greatly magnified their scale to attract attention, and not to be original.
This Post Has 0 Comments